My island

It was lying in bed last night that I began to question why I started keeping this public record of my experience of motherhood. Our windows were open to the summer air, a light rain fell and, understandably, I was feeling contemplative.

Casting my mind back, I thought in the very early days, it felt like this island of my old self in amongst the physical and emotional wreckage that having tiny twins had left in its wake. It linked me and my immediate alien state to the controllable and intellectual life I had known before.

As the months passed and life took on a new and less exhausting structure, my motives changed. I enjoyed hearing other people’s thoughts on what I was writing, and the idea that it gave them an insight into our life with babies in a new country, without me having to spend hours I didn’t have to spare on the phone.

Ever since my new life has come closer to my old life – intersecting professionally in at times quite a surprising way: my work takes me back to the office I sat in daily before the children were born, to the city where many of my friends still live, to the odd evening in restaurants I used to go to before I knew the less romantic reality the patter of tiny feet at 5am really meant. Now I am very busy and I have plenty of islands guiding me to myself.

So perhaps this record has become less essential? But, I thought watching the silhouetted leaves play their game on the curtains, it hasn’t: it’s just that its purpose has changed. No longer purely an overly-stylised record, nor a reminder of what I could do before my mind was addled with sleep deprivation, it has become a precious space for me to reflect on being a mother and what that means to me.

It is where I work out how I feel about certain challenges put in my way. It is where I muddle through how I ‘should’ be dealing with certain three-year old challenges to my desired status quo. High-blown as this may sound, I believe it is where I make note of my ideal of motherhood, in such a way that helps me act like that too (most of the time at least). Indeed, I would even go so far as to say that in writing this blog I possibly become a better mother, which is most likely why I persist.

Now enough pontificating and time to collect the children from nursery. Words are easier than actions.

A chocolate-bringing dragon

The cartoonish face on the screen stretched into a ghoulish smile. Misshapen teeth hung over its receding bottom lip, as it began to squawk, “That’s right. Well done” whilst clapping its claw-like hands. My little girl turned to me with her sweet face clouded and asked, “Is that a girl or a boy, Mummy?” To which I replied, “A girl, I think.” “I don’t like that girl. Let’s watch another video” And, I couldn’t blame her. The face on the screen was so repellent, so un-engaging, whether based in reality or fantasy, that I had no interest in watching it anymore either. 

At this juncture, I should make clear that this was not some inappropriately-chosen horror film aimed at much older children. No, it was the first one of the literacy programme on BBC Bitesize – their educational website. In a bogus attempt to make learning to read more fun, cheap computer animation had got it disastrously wrong – at least for my children. 

 Curiosity had driven me to it. Both children had recently expressed an interest in letters and words and I wanted to see what sort of approach one might take in teaching them more, beyond simply reading lots of books and pointing out the odd word here and there. I suspected (perhaps ignorantly) that whatever was on the BBC might be similar to what they might learn in school – and would therefore be interesting to see in its own right. 

The paucity of this offering, however, was more than demoralising. The content was utterly devoid of context: why should these words be learned rather than others; how would one use them; why were they being presented on a quasi desert island by strange partially human creatures with barely comprehensible voices without any reference to desert islands or  fantastical humanish beings who might live there … ? 

A day later I had the following conversation with my son: “I have a dragon in my home, but it is a very friendly dragon so it does not need to go in a cage. He gives me chocolate that dragon.” “Really?” I replied, “That’s very nice of him.” “Yes. And he’s got some for you too. It’s very delicious.” His imaginary world was littered with reality buoyed up by the magic dust of his own mind. His reality in other words consisted of the stories we read and the places we go to, just waiting to be picked up and played with, depending on what he wants them to do. 

Then it occurred to me that true learning is about creating a certain frame of reference, a certain ‘reality’ which is both fanciful and tangible. They have to be able to experience it, or at least much of it, directly or else it can’t be theirs to internalise and then manipulate at their own will. That’s why children’s authors who bend reality only ever so slightly to allow for wild adventure – Judith Kerr, Quentin Blake, Shirley Hughes, Helen Nicoll (even Meg and Mog go home to have tea on the grass after their journey to the moon, you see) are so wonderful. Such marvels of children’s literature probably do provide the best context for learning to read after all – which in any case is no longer very relevant; my children having temporarily abandoned their interest in words for scooters instead. 

An after nursery chat

It was in the middle of our usual lengthy negotiation over who would put on their shoes that the nursery teacher suggested we might arrange an after-hours meeting to discuss the development of my children. I was taken aback. Refusing to put on shoes was hardly grounds for real concern; indeed, I suspected I would have been more concerned had both children been doing everything I told them to do. But, yes, Thursday at 4pm would suit me fine.

The day before the meeting the teacher handed me a page of handwritten questions – she wanted me to spend some time thinking about how well I knew my children, she said. I felt a certain sense of intrepidation. Weren’t we just going to have a quick chat about how the children were getting on, whether or not they had friends and held a pencil properly –  nothing I had to prepare for.  Was there something wrong perhaps? Worse still, did she think I was doing something wrong? Of course I know my children, I said crossly (in my head). But for all my feeling of indignation, my conscientious streak prevailed and of course I devoted two hours that evening to some deep parental soul-searching. If I were being made to sit a parenting exam, I would be sure to pass it and with flying colours.

As I sat at our kitchen table in the gathering gloom, I was at first supremely confident in my assumption that I know both children very well. I am an attentive mother, lucky enough to work flexibly and therefore spend many hours with them each day. I talk to them, play with them, and hold their hands whilst they fall asleep. What more could I need to know. But as I sat there, chewing the end of my pen, I realised that this assumption was based on an understanding of my relationship with the children about a year and a half out of date. As babies, it felt impossible not to know them. They were almost extensions of me; attached both physically and emotionally in such a way that I felt attuned to their every need. But that baby phase is long gone and their obvious distinct demands, ideas and agendas sit in stark contrast to this early intimacy. Their motives these days are far more complex and not nearly so transparent.

Feeling muddle-headed, I moved onto the second question. “Can you relate to why your children respond to you in a certain why?” Thrown again. I realised I hadn’t the foggiest why one morning they ferociously insisted on eating only raisins arranged in a smily face on their porridge and the next morning breezily accepted anything dolloped in front of them. Or why some days they demanded my immediate and committed presence for all lavatorial moments, and other days they banned me from the bathroom with a determined shout. It occurred to me I didn’t actually know them at all.

I made a second cup of tea, and settled myself again at the kitchen table. Number 3: “How do you help your children through particular challenges and frustrations?” Aha – I thought, this was less about understanding their every move and more about creating a general sense of what they like to do and how to keep them bouncing along happily. And, even I manage that, most of the time. Thinking more broadly now, I toyed with a new idea. If we are truthful, we never completely understand anyone else, locked as we are in our minds with only imperfect language and gesture to help us communicate. For the most part, we accept this as the limitations of human nature and stumble along one way or another. But with our own children this feels shocking exactly because they were at first this near integral part of us.

So we find ourselves feeling compelled to constantly strive to understand them, second guessing their every turn and trying to mould them to be more like us so at least a few aspects of what they do are tangible. A mistake I would say. Of course, we should try hard to know them and to enjoy their company as fully as we can but beyond that any deeper, more purposeful character investigations are likely to lead to irritation and disappointment on both sides. It is in accepting them as utterly distinct from us, as possessing their own private, hidden minds, that we are able to make the space to watch them, listen to them, grow with them as we would with any good, close friend. I will constantly be in some new phase of my life, and they will be too – we must reacquaint ourselves constantly by spending time together but by assuming nothing.

The nursery teachers were rather surprised when I pulled out my own bundle of notes, and proceeded to take them through the questions they’d assigned. Let’s say they were somewhat surprised, though not displeased, when I ended my presentation of ideas. They hastened to add that the questions were intended to be a starting point, a way for them to introduce a few ideas about the current developmental stage, not an exam essay with a philosophical twist at the end. Morale of this story – if you want a speedy meeting, never ask a young woman with a tendency for over-anxious high achievement to prepare for anything she may perceive to be a test.

May Day Outing

To satiate any hungry grumbling we first ate cake in the greenhouse – the children picking raspberry jelly off the top. “That’s a pretty tree, Mama!” they shouted as the ran away from us down the path. Looking at the colour seeping back into their peaky cheeks, I felt like Heidi’s grandfather ordering a strict diet of creamy milk and wholesome bread for the ailing Clara. But here, with the skyline of the city still in sight, where the goats don’t produce, it was jelly and cherry blossom that did it.

The thought to be so adventurous with our bank holiday outing had not occurred to me. A friend with a car and a dog-earred copy of a city tips magazine for children suggested heading to the edge of the city, where the Botanic garden is wild and children can roam free. As I sat squashed between the car seats, knees up to my chin, I realised a hard winter and two years constrained by early twin motherhood had made my ideas for days out rather cautious and unambitious. This was the spur I needed.

All afternoon the children raced and whooped and pulled up wild flowers in their sticky fingers. Emboldened by the wide expanse of open sky, they pointed at the man doing tai chi in the distance and began to imitate his slow and loping walk. Hilarity ensued. It turns out playgrounds are not enough for city children. Hamster wheels on a human scale, they are too prescriptive for real excursions.

A few words on costumes

Yesterday was Carnival in our nursery – a German thing, rather like a big fancy dress party but where making fun and chaos is taken very seriously by everyone (adults and children) involved. The children were expected to come in costume and the day would deviate from its normal safe routines, allowing for dancing to pop music, watching a little video and eating party food; there were limits, however, on the amount of sweeties and cakes each child was allowed to amass on his or her plate.

We talked for at least a fortnight about what costumes our children would like to wear. We started at a lion and a cat, lingered on the idea of Hansel and Gretel and finally, having done a careful survey (a breathless dash around the local shops the day before) of affordable capes and polystyrene props, plumped on a somewhat predictable knight and princess in the end. I must admit I had dallied for days over the idea that I would make costumes by hand but the pressure of potential filial disappointment, when they realised their costumes were nothing but clumsily adapted versions for their own clothes, pushed me down a more commercial route. Next year – I will start earlier and make our own.

In any case, the afternoon before was filled with excitement. How they paraded, sceptre and sword in hand, our sweet damsel and brave soldier, tripping up over dress hems and peeking out of polyester helmets. They would have slept in character, if we hadn’t been worried about the flammability / suffocation risk. And again some convincing was required in the morning that is was simply too cold outside to walk there already robed. Buzzing like bees, we rushed up the road and round the corner, trailing pink netting and silvery armour in the brisk wind.

But anticipation was the sweetest part. When we were greeted by a great big green frog and a golden-robed lady (barely recognisable as their trusted nursery teachers), both children recoiled and buried themselves in my lap. Some coaxing and much explanation later, they stood hesitantly, but at least now costumed, peering into the noisy room where usually an hushed hum of child’s play reigns. “That’s too loud for me,” the little princess said, looking at me with great big eyes. The music was lowered, her hand was taken by the now-recognised golden lady and she was convinced to join in.

Hours later, slobbing at home in trusted old tracksuit trousers and tomato-stained t-shirts, eating a near-monastic meal of boiled potatoes and fish, they claimed to have enjoyed themselves. I believe them only partially. I can believe they liked eating donuts. I can also believe they liked wearing their costumes, and having them admired by their little friends. But beyond that, I think they probably prefer normal days. You see, when I picked them up, their expressions were dazed, and their reactions dulled. At the age of nearly three, so many costumes and extraordinary experiences had all been too much.

I am forever grateful for efforts made to please our children, but a little sensitivity and a lot less face paint possibly would have made it a happier day. A slight breach of normality is exciting and funny – costumes in the living room for instance. But there is a reason, clowns are almost universally feared by young children. Far too strange.

A lesson in eating

I have a clear recollection of my five-year-old self, perched on the edge of a hard chair, feet dangling high above the pavement outside a French cafe, carefully measuring out precious orangina, no more than an inch at a time, into a tall glass. I was trying to make it last longer. And it did: I also remember that particular feeling of smugness on seeing that my brother had finished and I had at least a third left. The early actions of a highly competitive pedant, you might say. But to question my childish attitude towards consumption never occurred to me, until I witnessed my two-and-a-half year old daughter employ the exact same approach this Christmas.

Her behaviour would not have been so striking to me, had it not been for her twin brother doing the exact opposite. Both relishing the heretofore unknown access to chocolate, they indulged in the opportunity in quite different ways. He ripped off the silver foil and crammed the chocolate into his mouth in its entirety, chewing rapidly. She, by contrast, slowly peeled off the wrapper, tiny bit by tiny bit, and then proceeded to lick and nibble at the chocolate for another ten minutes, despite our objections to the impending melted mess.

Most interestingly perhaps, aside from the unfathomable proliferation of chocolate smears in places those little hands without some feat of magic could not possibly reach, was that the incident threw up the suggestion that such behaviour is more intuitive than learned. It would be easy to assume on seeing a small child shovelling in food, without pausing to catch breath, that this was something the child had observed in their parents and therefore deemed an acceptable, yes normal, way to eat. Not so, it seems. Neither of our children has been told how to eat a chocolate, nor more broadly instructed in any particular way about the speed at which they should eat any other food. Their experiences of food to date have been pretty much identical – they eat the same meals with us at the same time. You would think, therefore, that their table (and chocolate) manners would be similar rather than so divergent. After the chocolate experiment, there appears to be something more fundamental going on.

Of course, an additional ‘learned’ explanation may lie in the fact that he tends to display more anxiety that she, his darling sister, might take things off him (particularly his most prized possessions – like chocolate) if he does not protect them from her. We have other examples of this: hiding miniature cars under the bookshelf when (he thinks) no one else is looking, stowing little plastic men in his pockets, consuming four large chunks of pear in close succession, when the threat of another little pair of hands was hovering over his plate. She tends to be more relaxed about these things. But I don’t think he felt threatened this time. She had her own chocolate, and we were there to police the situation.

I actually think he, though by no means a greedy child, just enjoys eating quickly, and she likes to savour whatever she might have. With no implicit merit to attribute to either method, I suppose we should just let them get on and revel in it, whilst we clear up the chocolate stains.

Another type of childhood

I am struck, watching my two small children grow up in Berlin, how different their childhood is from mine in England’s industrial north in the 1980s. We are very integrated here – most of our friends are German. the nursery the children go to is German, and the places we frequent are almost completely German. Instinctively, my children say ‘guck guck’ instead of ‘peepo’ and ‘Aua!’ instead of ‘ouch!’. They drink fruit tea with their afternoon snack and heavy dark bread is nothing unusual. Yes, for now, it would seem that my children are German, with only a streak of English.

I don’t really mind this, though I sometimes feel nostalgic for the things they cannot know: the jangling bells of the ice-cream van on a long summer’s evening; the feeling of a school uniform tie tight around a buttoned up shirt neck; grubbing around the back garden in a private kingdom. They will be city children, who remember going to public spaces to play out their fantasy games (parks and playgrounds), who slouch around grandiose nineteenth century city school buildings in jeans and the latest trainers, and only think of ice-cream as being from the organic ice-cream parlour across the road – if we stay here, that is.

It is inevitable that childhoods change over the generations. My parents experienced the tail-end of rationing, and most girls they knew became teachers, secretaries or nurses. When I was five, they bought a chunky desktop computer; its green and black screen still vivid in my memory. I was scolded for telephoning for hours, wires twisting around doors and handsets secreted into corners. Most girls I know became lawyers, business women and journalists. Now in this modern digital age, smart phones and tablets are ubiquitous. I don’t suppose my children will read many paperback novels. What they will have access to in fifteen years time is unimaginable, such is the current pace of technological change.

But bringing up my children as an expat, especially in an environment where they mostly speak a language that is not my own, adds another layer of difference, and at times, a sense of remoteness. As they absorb words and cultural norms that I have only learned and distantly experienced as an adult, I find myself consciously emphasising the aspects of our lives that make them English – perhaps in a way that I wouldn’t were we living in England: I insist we open our Christmas presents on the morning of 25th December, at birthdays it is always a sponge cake, and I parade in my old London-faithful wardrobe at the playground. If and when we move back to the UK, I can imagine my German husband will feel more precious about being German again. Christmas will shift to the 24th, and fruit tea will be back on the table. Until then, it is I who can understand in the tiniest of ways how migrant communities become so deeply entrenched in the traditions of the homeland – because it stops home and your children from feeling so far away.

What’s in a welly

They catch you unaware, those knee-knocking, heart-stopping, tear-inducing moments of absolute parental adoration. Chance would have it that these swoops of love, at once all consuming and utterly debilitating, mostly occur when you’re supposed to be doing something sensible – making a sandwich, buying a stamp or laying down the law about how many biscuits small children are allowed to eat in one sitting, perhaps. Chance would also have, it seems, that these come when the object of your affection is invariably doing something he or she should not – oh, I don’t know, eating peanut butter by the spoonful, running a little hand along the back of a mud-encrusted car, stealing another child’s plastic scooter at the playground, or something; you get the gist.

So it was today that we were marching (sensibly) hand in hand, in new wellington boots (them not me), to the local shops. Rain had fallen incessantly all morning, and this was our ten minute, pocket of blue sky dash for the sake of fresh air, sanity and a new writing pad. Now, wearing wellington boots instills a certain sense of pride in any two year old, and that they were new added to the sense of exuberance at suddenly and unexpectedly being outdoors. Possibly, this was at the root of it all.

Ever the indulgent mother, I encouraged them to test their boots (one red pair, one blue pair), pointing out the smaller puddles and encouraging them to run through. A few splashes were within the realms of acceptability, I thought, in my sensible Saturday morning way. More fool me: every puddle became a target – the bigger the better, of course. Before I knew it, two little hands slipped away from my grasp and both pairs of boots were charging off to the newly formed lake lapping gently over half the pavement. “Don’t! Don’t jump up and down in there!,” I called after them, “It’s too big … .” Too late. It was then, as the water dripped over the tops of boots, tights and trousers quickly darkening with mud, and the prospect that we could get anything sensible done washing away with the old leaves down the drain, that I had to stop, catch my breath and marvel at the wondrous, hilarious, soaking wet children, I could call my own. I forgot my writing pad and shivered with pleasure, as their shouts of laughter echoed around the houses and their boots pounded the pavement, water leaping around them.

It’s probably not the done thing to tell people how enraptured you are with your children, but I suppose every now and again is forgivable. The new boots must have gone to my head too.

Space for anything else

It was when the green Spiderman pants ended up on the grocery shop counter that I realised I had entered a new phase of motherhood. The porridge oats, big pack of raisins and check out woman all looked at me rather unforgivingly as I balanced yet more unlikely items – a rabbit-headed whistle, two toy cars, a miniature helicopter with moving propellor blades, a book about farm animals, three used tissues and a rubber band – alongside. My wallet still eluded me.

Red-faced and too many minutes later, I was out of the shop with an overflowing handbag slung over my shoulder; porridge and raisins in either hand. When did I become a walking children’s junk collection, I wondered crossly pounding across the road. This impossible, unpractical, unliveable fullness of my handbag had encroached on me unwittingly; its smart exterior belying its contents which were dominated by the beloved accoutrements of two year olds and those essential maternal supplies. I started to work backwards.

This cross-contamination of child and adult spheres – my handbag had been exclusively mine up until only a few months ago – must date to the absence of nappies, I worked out. The children drinking out of cups and normal water bottles might also share some of the blame. More significantly, at the same time as gladly abandoning those bulky artefacts of babyhood, we had consigned the big red bag (which with its Mary Poppins’ capacity screamed ‘small child’ even when not dangling off the back of the buggy). Of course, these events, these markers of childhood had brought associated joys and increased levels of independence, but my handbag had certainly suffered.

You see, now there is new stuff. Which self-possessed child would go anywhere without a toy car and rye cracker in hand? Which self-possessed child would accept having snotty tissues pushed back into their own pockets? And which self-possessed mother would go anywhere without a spare pair of green spiderman pants ? Then, invariably, within five minutes any beloved item is cast aside in favour of a more interesting object, usually belonging to another child. Before I have remembered to cast out the unwanted paraphernalia, the car becomes a digger, the pants must be accompanied by socks, and the crackers have crumbled into a thousand crumbs leaving a perceptible trail over my every last belonging.

This morning in a moment of exasperation and knowing I had three childless hours ahead I switched handbags. Paying for an expensive face cream, I found Mister Clever and a strawberry hair slide. Perhaps this is another sort of coming of age.

If you …

Outside dusk is falling. I am sat on the floor between two cots, one child sleeping soundly, the other, bright-eyed, sits staring at me like a prisoner through the cot bars. “Lie down,” I say in an urgent whisper, “It’s late. It’s time to go to sleep.” He shakes his head petulantly. I have been in their bedroom trying to coax them to sleep for more than an hour. My stomach rumbles and my patience wears thin. The hope of ‘achieving something’ this evening gives a final flicker and fades away. The irritation seeps into my voice, as I command, “Lie down now and go to sleep” and try my best “I mean it this time” stare, but to no avail. “No,” he replies audibly this time, “More stories – about a mouse, a giraffe and a spider.” Charmingly sweet in other circumstances but tonight it’s far too late for that. Still, I back off and change my tack. “If you lie down now, I’ll tell you one more story.” “No,” he says frowning, “Sitting up.” Desperate now, “If you lie down now, we can go and get an ice cream tomorrow.” As if magic words, he smiles at me, lies down, closes his eyes and two minutes later I am standing in the kitchen eating cold rice from the pan.

We are widely discouraged from bribing our children. It will set a precedent, we are told, and soon the child will only be willing to behave as requested when there is a defined reward. And then, continues the finger wagging warning, said child will stop accepting the initial level of reward and want more and more and more, until we are left with a rotund spoilt toe-rag – the mind conjures the image of Violet Beauregarde for the Roald Dahl fans amongst us. The child needs to learn what is right and wrong, and understand the benefits for themselves in following their parents’ taught moral code, for the sake of being nice, friendly people that go to bed on command. Of course, I agree in principle but in reality so often feel very tempted down that chocolate-coin-paved path. If only it weren’t so effective at producing the desired results, at least in the short term.

So as I nibble my cold evening meal, instead of behaving like a respectable parent and chastising myself for the successful bedtime ice cream promise, I find myself thinking it rather hypocritical that we adults disapprove so strongly of bribery. Surely, adult life is filled with bribes to get us doing things we would rather not – the biggest difference being that they’re called incentives once you turn 25. What is a salary bonus, if not a bribe? Or, in the spiritual arena, the promise of eternal life? Or, on a smaller, more ice cream equivalent scale, work drinks on a Friday evening? We even bribe ourselves – think of all the diet books which encourage you to treat yourself to other things – manicures, facials, a new pair of shoes – whilst starving yourself of food. Bribes, bribes and more bribes. I admit we are at times driven by other motives: social expectation, a feeling of obligation, even genuine human kindness also play their role. And we are sceptical about the positive impact of bribes when they become too large and disproportionate to the matter they serve to reward – think of how recklessly all those super-charged bonus earning bankers have been behaving. Small bribes, however, seem to be perfectly acceptable, and in fact, widely utilised for the common good.

Pausing briefly before picking up a nectarine to wonder if eating fruit so late at night is wise, I proceed recklessly and am struck by another profound thought. What is punishment, if not a form of inverse bribery. When parents actively punish their children beyond scolding words: stopping of pocket money, going straight home from the playground, taking away a particular toy – something I am usually loathe to do – the incentive becomes not having the fun spoilt, not being deprived of something. So where does that leave us? It must be about finding the right bribe. Say I want to encourage in my children a love of reading, therefore bribing with another story is probably okay. I don’t mind if they have an occasional ice cream, particularly when we know so many of their friends will be at the local ice cafe. That too, though only once in a while, seems to be acceptable.Trampolining is the latest big hit: the promise of that the next day yet another approved method. With that, I promise myself that if I manage not to become irritated at bedtime for an entire week, I’ll treat myself to something special too. Tired but cheerful now, I take myself to bed.